data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa00/4fa00abed439732d3b3102e0d8a97dcbdb2030ba" alt="Okay, she is admittedly something less than "natural", but then so were the girls I dated as a teenager. Welcome to Mr. Greenberg's neighborhood."
Okay, she is admittedly something less than “natural”, but then so were the girls I dated as a teenager. Welcome to Mr. Greenberg’s neighborhood.
The evidence of the immediate appeal of most music to most people is the reaction of children to music. It is my experience that until children become overtly self-conscious about themselves and begin to subjectively discriminate between things (somewhere between ages 6 and 9), there are no more musical creatures on the planet. They will sing without inhibition at the drop of a hat and will dance to pretty much anything with a joy and abandon that the rest of us can only marvel at. They do not know “good music” from “bad music”; “right music” from “wrong music”; “modern music” from “music by dead people”; “Gangnam Style” from “Mozart”; they like pretty much ALL of it, and they will demonstrate their enthusiasm spontaneously.
(Just so, when certain folks tell me that opera – with its continuous singing – is “unnatural”, I suggest they watch a group of children at play. As often as not, the kids sing-song their words to themselves and/or to each other, and in doing so demonstrate what every song writer and opera composer knows: that by adding musical inflection to words one intensifies the meaning and the feelings behind those words a gazillion-fold. In truth, silly though it may, on occasion, appear, there is nothing more natural than opera.)
Tomorrow: suggestion number one for how to get and keep our kids interested in music.